Aug 13 , 2021
For those unaware of who Vasquez is, he's the reason the only case of an arrest over a bump stock was dismissed, when his expert testimony for the prosecution would have been "this does not constitute a machine gun". Had that prosecutor gone to trial, precedent would have been set. Read Vasquez's letter about the FRT also "not constituting a machine gun" below. Be sure to read this guy's resume at the bottom, he's been on fed payroll as an expert witness defining machineguns.